Letters
Letters Policy
 
DeWittDailyNews.com welcomes letters to the editor, as a way we can let our readers and listeners sound off on the issues most important to them. If you wish to submit a letter, please note the following guidelines: 
 
  • All letters should be no more than 500 words in length, and should include the writer's name, address and phone number. We will not publish street address, e-mail address or phone number; rather, we reserve the right to contact writers to determine their validity.
     
  • We do not accept handwritten letters or letters submitted on paper.  All letters must be submitted electronically to whow@randyradio.com
     
  • If the editor comments about a letter, the reader may respond with at least as many words as were used by the editor. We would like to stimulate a sincere dialogue.
     
  • All letters become property of DeWitt Daily News.com and Kaskaskia Broadcasting, Inc., dba WHOW/WEZC Radio, and are subject to editing for length, content, grammar, punctuation at the editor's discretion.
     
  • Material that may libel or slander an individual or group will neither be accepted nor posted.
     
  • You may email letters to whow@randyradio.com; to ensure your message is received, please include "Letter to the Editor" in the subject line.
 
We look forward to hearing from you.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Posted October 28, 2020

 

Dear Editor:
 

The DeWitt County Board incumbents up for election have a few questions that need to be answered.  These types of questions would be considerations a sound business would address, that experienced representatives would consider, and that sound legal advice would ensure are answered prior to proceeding with regular business.

 

In 2018 and 2019, the wind company for Alta Farms Wind Project II submitted two special use permits.  Each permit filed required a very sizable fee to be paid by the wind company.  In each case, it was reported that the monies (much more than $250,000) were added to the General Fund.  These monies could have instead been earmarked to pay for independent engineering and/or legal costs, etc.  What was this money used for and why was it not placed in a special fund?

 

In years leading up to the filing of these permits, several amendments to wind ordinances were recommended to the Board that would have prevented legal and engineering costs, among others, from being incurred by the County (residents).  I believe the term “indemnification” (compensation for harm or loss; security against legal liability for one's action) was part of the recommended amendment wording.  And as I remember, this was part of an address made to the Board during this process by one of the new candidates.  Why did all the incumbents vote against this recommendation?

 

These are just a few of the questions incumbents need to answer in order to inform us constituents.  Why were these questions not part of the radio forum, or part of the latest pro-incumbent letters to the editor, or part of all the postings, mailing, and newspaper articles? 

 

ALL the letters, mailings and articles suggest these apparent shortcomings in the experienced incumbents’ operation of this County Board are the fault of those affected by this project, and now, bearing liability falls on the County’s residents.  Where is the incumbents’ share of responsibility?

 

Pamela D. Elliott

Wapella IL 

Local Weather - Sponsored By:
 
Townhall Top of the Hour News

 

SRN News